🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to enact a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," stated one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong data".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is largely happening at the state government level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this global discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.